Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 83862 for case code.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 83862 for case code.
Town of Cedarburg v. Thomas Shewczyk
. In this case, the CUP was a special limited conditional use permit under sec. 10-1-11 of the Town’s zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5110 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, the CUP was a special limited conditional use permit under sec. 10-1-11 of the Town’s zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5110 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so, whether there are any material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95621 - 2013-04-17
the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so, whether there are any material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95621 - 2013-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95621 - 2014-09-15
the parties’ affidavits and other submissions to determine whether the movant has made a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95621 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
purposes. She claims that WIS. ADM. CODE DWD § 40.02(13)(i) and case law require these benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15887 - 2017-09-21
purposes. She claims that WIS. ADM. CODE DWD § 40.02(13)(i) and case law require these benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15887 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
probation case not only was unfair, but also defied its own rules,[3] the Wisconsin Administrative Code[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34830 - 2008-12-09
probation case not only was unfair, but also defied its own rules,[3] the Wisconsin Administrative Code[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34830 - 2008-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, and the 2011-12 version. Therefore, we rely on the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP818
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107543 - 2017-09-21
in this case, and the 2011-12 version. Therefore, we rely on the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP818
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107543 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶7 At issue in this case are two areas of exemption: “sales for resale” and sales to tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29
). ¶7 At issue in this case are two areas of exemption: “sales for resale” and sales to tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
2004 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16708 - 2017-09-21
2004 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
2004 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16710 - 2017-09-21
2004 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
2004 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16709 - 2017-09-21
2004 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16709 - 2017-09-21