Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 83471 for case codes/1000.
Search results 2201 - 2210 of 83471 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to this case, Robles was an inmate at Fox Lake Correctional Institution (FLCI) and the Wisconsin Secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
to this case, Robles was an inmate at Fox Lake Correctional Institution (FLCI) and the Wisconsin Secure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
Door County v. Fredric Wittig
ordinance. He argues the judgment should be reversed because (1) the County did not prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6603 - 2005-03-31
ordinance. He argues the judgment should be reversed because (1) the County did not prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6603 - 2005-03-31
City of Prairie Du Chien v. George J. Eastman
alcohol content had been periodically tested as required by various provisions of the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8576 - 2005-03-31
alcohol content had been periodically tested as required by various provisions of the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Wayne v. Daniel L. Bishop
AND BUILDING CODE ENFORCEMENT Our analysis of the constitutional issues in this case requires that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9594 - 2017-09-19
AND BUILDING CODE ENFORCEMENT Our analysis of the constitutional issues in this case requires that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9594 - 2017-09-19
Town of Wayne v. Daniel L. Bishop
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-2387
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-2387
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a single-family residential district. VILLAGE OF UNION GROVE, WIS., CODE § 118-278(3), provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209436 - 2018-03-07
, a single-family residential district. VILLAGE OF UNION GROVE, WIS., CODE § 118-278(3), provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209436 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
accessory structure. EAU CLAIRE COUNTY, WIS., CODE §§ 18.07.015A., 18.07.025A.1 The maximum height
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66288 - 2014-09-15
accessory structure. EAU CLAIRE COUNTY, WIS., CODE §§ 18.07.015A., 18.07.025A.1 The maximum height
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
principal structure and a private garage is a permitted accessory structure. Eau Claire County, Wis., Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2005-03-31
principal structure and a private garage is a permitted accessory structure. Eau Claire County, Wis., Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to show that any alleged defects were a violation of any specific building code provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31018 - 2007-12-03
to show that any alleged defects were a violation of any specific building code provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31018 - 2007-12-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
is the put up or shut up moment in a case. It’s not quite fair to say that this issue of the building code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31018 - 2014-09-15
is the put up or shut up moment in a case. It’s not quite fair to say that this issue of the building code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31018 - 2014-09-15