Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22011 - 22020 of 97705 for court records search online.

COURT OF APPEALS
consistent with the trial court’s on-the-record reasoning at Grubor’s original sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103595 - 2013-10-29

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 13, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12

COURT OF APPEALS
, 311 N.W.2d 600 (1981) (court will not consider affidavits that are not part of the record).
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73673 - 2012-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS
facts of record support court’s decision). The record supports the court’s implicit finding. Angel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34365 - 2008-10-20

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 30, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29206 - 2007-05-29

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32006 - 2008-03-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. However, if the circuit court fails to record sufficient reasons to support its decision, this court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98324 - 2013-06-19

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 11, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30223 - 2007-09-10

COURT OF APPEALS
the commissions was retaliatory. Further, our review of the record reveals none.[4] The circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33514 - 2008-07-28

COURT OF APPEALS
noted. [3] Regrettably, the State misrepresents the record. It asserts, “The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06