Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22011 - 22020 of 49879 for our.

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
courts by our state constitution, and not by acts of the legislature. Miller Brewing Co. v. LIRC, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6204 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Arbor Vitae-Woodruff Joint School District No. 1 v. Gulf Insurance Company
. Lieffring, 59 Wis. 2d 52, 64, 207 N.W.2d 610 (1973), our supreme court stated, “Generally, the studied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3835 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 23, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of...
deference to the circuit court. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34096 - 2008-09-22

[PDF]
861, 723 N.W.2d 732. If our analysis of the statutory language “yields a plain meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259014 - 2020-04-30

[PDF] Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Edward Hall
because, in a subsequent case, our supreme court clarified the issue. In Mau, the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7374 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination begins “with the presumption that the [circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=312467 - 2020-12-10

[PDF] NOTICE
or found facts, thus presenting questions of law for our de novo review. See Warehouse II, LLC v. DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50755 - 2014-09-15

WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP703 Complete Title of ...
courts from other jurisdictions have weighed in on this issue and, while several agree with our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78512 - 2012-03-27

COURT OF APPEALS
our decision in Miller v. Luther, 170 Wis. 2d 429, 489 N.W.2d 651 (Ct. App. 1992), holds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36088 - 2009-04-06

COURT OF APPEALS
(citation omitted). Our standard of review is “‘highly deferential.’” See State v. Shomberg, 2006 WI 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116820 - 2014-07-14