Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22021 - 22030 of 64775 for divorce records/1000.

State v. Jesse N. Pearson
if it is supported by a logical rationale, is based on facts of record and involves no error of law. See Shawn B.N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12533 - 2014-03-09

State v. Jeffrey G. Henschel
and provides a record cite. Unfortunately, the record cite is to a page of his trial court motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12424 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
offer itself is not a part of the appellate record. See supra n.3. However, the testimony during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110500 - 2014-04-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in the record. At the preliminary hearing, both Cassandra and E.H. testified that Turner encouraged them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26

COURT OF APPEALS
benefits when he left Pacific Cycle. We affirm because the record reveals no material factual dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84028 - 2015-04-26

Rosemarie Pitz v. Bernard Pitz
, the circuit court found that Bernard’s warranty deed was not recorded until April 14, 1992,[1] after Cecelia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14625 - 2006-10-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report addressing that issue. Having independently reviewed the entire record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959095 - 2025-05-20

[PDF] Kim DeValk v. Patricia A. Vadnais
conclude that the trial court’s findings are adequate and supported by the evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16338 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael C. Cull
will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Section 805.17(2), STATS. An appellate court will search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13225 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11585 - 2005-03-31