Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22021 - 22030 of 65218 for or b.
Search results 22021 - 22030 of 65218 for or b.
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06(3)(b). Under § 974.06(3)(b): “If it appears that counsel is necessary and if the defendant claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138232 - 2015-03-18
. § 974.06(3)(b). Under § 974.06(3)(b): “If it appears that counsel is necessary and if the defendant claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138232 - 2015-03-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
] classes that would indicate that he’s behind”; � Joseph F. “testified that he gets basically B’s [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28704 - 2014-09-15
] classes that would indicate that he’s behind”; � Joseph F. “testified that he gets basically B’s [sic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28704 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 153
), and two counts of misdemeanor bail jumping (as a repeater) in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 948.02(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55951 - 2014-09-15
), and two counts of misdemeanor bail jumping (as a repeater) in violation of WIS. STAT. §§ 948.02(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55951 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leonard McDowell
trial. B. Postconviction competency hearing. McDowell next argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10418 - 2017-09-20
trial. B. Postconviction competency hearing. McDowell next argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10418 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Billye L. Massey
. §§ 961.41(3g)(e) and 961.48, and felony bail- jumping, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
. §§ 961.41(3g)(e) and 961.48, and felony bail- jumping, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Daniel Bertrand
or innocence.” Both of these are permissible reasons under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.81(3)(b) and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4267 - 2017-09-19
or innocence.” Both of these are permissible reasons under WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.81(3)(b) and (c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4267 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29132 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Curley, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Debra Markwardt v. John Valcq
. § 814.025(3)(b) is intended to erect a high standard). ¶14 No costs to either party. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20304 - 2017-09-21
. § 814.025(3)(b) is intended to erect a high standard). ¶14 No costs to either party. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Hogan
was 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21
was 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(b). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meritorious challenge to the contempt order. B. Frivolous Appeal ¶15 The County seeks costs, fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
meritorious challenge to the contempt order. B. Frivolous Appeal ¶15 The County seeks costs, fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15