Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22021 - 22030 of 50100 for our.
Search results 22021 - 22030 of 50100 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.20 (2009-10).1 In accordance with our holdings in State v. Behnke, 203 Wis. 2d 43, 553 N.W.2d 265
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91016 - 2014-09-15
. § 973.20 (2009-10).1 In accordance with our holdings in State v. Behnke, 203 Wis. 2d 43, 553 N.W.2d 265
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91016 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 43. We owe no deference to the circuit court’s decision on our certiorari review of the DOC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141358 - 2015-05-06
N.W.2d 43. We owe no deference to the circuit court’s decision on our certiorari review of the DOC’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141358 - 2015-05-06
State v. Pamela P.
-appeal motion following our remand for that purpose. The motion incorrectly denominates the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
-appeal motion following our remand for that purpose. The motion incorrectly denominates the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6767 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victory Fireworks, Inc.
). If the statute's meaning is plain on its face, our inquiry ends, and we will apply it to the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15057 - 2005-03-31
). If the statute's meaning is plain on its face, our inquiry ends, and we will apply it to the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15057 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in an attempt to rebut the State’s brief. We observe that the affidavit in our correspondence file bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
in an attempt to rebut the State’s brief. We observe that the affidavit in our correspondence file bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶7 Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
. ¶7 Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47707 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our independent review of the records and the no-merit report, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245274 - 2019-08-14
our independent review of the records and the no-merit report, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245274 - 2019-08-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ANALYSIS. ¶7 Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
. ANALYSIS. ¶7 Sentencing lies within the trial court’s discretion, and our review is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
obligation in the interest of justice. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
obligation in the interest of justice. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208212 - 2018-02-06
St. John's Home of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
. St. John’s appeals from the circuit court order. II. DISCUSSION Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11485 - 2005-03-31
. St. John’s appeals from the circuit court order. II. DISCUSSION Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11485 - 2005-03-31