Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 29823 for des.
WI App 39 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP427-CR Complete Title ...
of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Smith, 2010 WI 16, ¶8, 323 Wis. 2d 377, 780 N.W.2d 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108953 - 2014-04-29
of the constitutionality of a statute is de novo. State v. Smith, 2010 WI 16, ¶8, 323 Wis. 2d 377, 780 N.W.2d 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108953 - 2014-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
the defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
Milwaukee Police Association v. Arthur Jones
that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See State ex rel. Schultz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14924 - 2005-03-31
that law to undisputed facts, we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. See State ex rel. Schultz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14924 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
Sheri D. Meyers v. Patrick Schultz
the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7334 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79396 - 2014-09-15
. DISCUSSION ¶8 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79396 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jack R. Hayes
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Because the trial court did not rule on the deficiency component
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4784 - 2005-03-31
Rainald Schurmann v. Guy Neau
. ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2233 - 2005-03-31
. ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2233 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01
Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. We determine de novo whether the defendant has demonstrated deficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98794 - 2013-07-01