Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 29712 for des.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 29712 for des.
State v. Jonathon R. K.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9206 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9206 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. We review de novo the municipality’s decision, not the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193560 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. We review de novo the municipality’s decision, not the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193560 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 ¶12 We review de novo the question of whether proffered evidence is evidence of “prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238199 - 2019-03-28
6 ¶12 We review de novo the question of whether proffered evidence is evidence of “prior sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238199 - 2019-03-28
Diane Haddican-Czestler v. Mitchell J. Barrock
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2005-03-31
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 433. We review de novo “‘the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611485 - 2023-01-18
.2d 433. We review de novo “‘the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611485 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54852 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Naydihor, 2004 WI 43, ¶11, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54852 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is well-known. We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52591 - 2010-07-26
judgment is well-known. We review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52591 - 2010-07-26
Breianne S. Johnson v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
of statutes, only legal questions are raised, which we review de novo. Silingo v. Village of Mukwonago, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10790 - 2005-03-31
of statutes, only legal questions are raised, which we review de novo. Silingo v. Village of Mukwonago, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10790 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70216 - 2014-09-15
standard is a question of law which we review de novo.” Ide v. LIRC, 224 Wis. 2d 159, 166, 589 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70216 - 2014-09-15