Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 68502 for did.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court explained that since Paragon did not prevail on its claims, it was “not entitled to taxes, costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
. The court explained that since Paragon did not prevail on its claims, it was “not entitled to taxes, costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125234 - 2014-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for good cause. Moreover, C.W. did not object to the extensions. Therefore, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177488 - 2017-09-21
for good cause. Moreover, C.W. did not object to the extensions. Therefore, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177488 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the City of Oshkosh did not follow this rule in valuing Walgreen properties as its assessments relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131662 - 2014-12-16
that the City of Oshkosh did not follow this rule in valuing Walgreen properties as its assessments relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131662 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Sweat
did not discharge these debts, and that a civil six-year statute of limitations did not apply to bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
did not discharge these debts, and that a civil six-year statute of limitations did not apply to bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
she testified that she did not observe Kasten drinking. Shortly after Kasten left, Terry decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197952 - 2017-10-18
she testified that she did not observe Kasten drinking. Shortly after Kasten left, Terry decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197952 - 2017-10-18
[PDF]
State v. James Evans
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in any respect, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in any respect, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
,” and that “he did touch the gun used in this homicide when Mason picked him up … that day.” ¶4 At Cecil’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
,” and that “he did touch the gun used in this homicide when Mason picked him up … that day.” ¶4 At Cecil’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John D. Meindl
effect and did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting testimony on Meindl’s HGN test, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21
effect and did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting testimony on Meindl’s HGN test, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
own trailer there. Bernetta did not make any objection to Gladys using the overlap parcel. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
own trailer there. Bernetta did not make any objection to Gladys using the overlap parcel. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54735 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
Duffey Law Office v. Tank Transport, Inc.
competence consistent with that claimed expertise. The trial court decision did not clarify which standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9662 - 2017-09-19
competence consistent with that claimed expertise. The trial court decision did not clarify which standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9662 - 2017-09-19