Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 51735 for him.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 51735 for him.
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and the clerk responded that Clacks was wearing those items when she observed him in the store that day. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75584 - 2011-12-21
,” and the clerk responded that Clacks was wearing those items when she observed him in the store that day. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75584 - 2011-12-21
State v. Ricky McMorris
testimony is unclear as to whether Jordan told him that the robber had facial hair. Wortock first testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31
testimony is unclear as to whether Jordan told him that the robber had facial hair. Wortock first testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
court accepted his pleas, found him guilty, and granted the State’s motion to dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112883 - 2014-05-27
court accepted his pleas, found him guilty, and granted the State’s motion to dismiss and read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112883 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Donna M. Trautman
claims Krerowicz then told her that he wanted her to help him die. Trautman held a pillow over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5507 - 2017-09-19
claims Krerowicz then told her that he wanted her to help him die. Trautman held a pillow over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5507 - 2017-09-19
Bernie J. Cudnohosky v. David H. Schwarz
attempted to discuss the telephone call with him, Cudnohosky knew he was on parole and subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13148 - 2005-03-31
attempted to discuss the telephone call with him, Cudnohosky knew he was on parole and subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13148 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin L. C.
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06.[1] Kevin’s motion challenged a 1998 judgment convicting him of sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
under Wis. Stat. § 974.06.[1] Kevin’s motion challenged a 1998 judgment convicting him of sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Gary W. S.
and that count was dismissed; June 12, 1998, disorderly conduct and then the disorderly conduct that I had him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6728 - 2017-09-20
and that count was dismissed; June 12, 1998, disorderly conduct and then the disorderly conduct that I had him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6728 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
not consider this information when it sentenced him; it only considered his character in terms of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27500 - 2006-12-18
not consider this information when it sentenced him; it only considered his character in terms of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27500 - 2006-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
contacted him and directed him to commence work on the Fitness America Project. McKeefry testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90473 - 2012-12-12
contacted him and directed him to commence work on the Fitness America Project. McKeefry testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90473 - 2012-12-12
Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith
that, if proved, might entitle him to relief. First, Adell claims that comments in his inmate records stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2125 - 2005-03-31
that, if proved, might entitle him to relief. First, Adell claims that comments in his inmate records stating he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2125 - 2005-03-31