Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Richard A. Engelbrecht
in a small claims eviction action. He did not provide the court or plaintiff's counsel with notice of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16426 - 2005-03-31
in a small claims eviction action. He did not provide the court or plaintiff's counsel with notice of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16426 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
filed under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08).[1] Because Warren’s claims are either procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36883 - 2009-06-22
filed under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08).[1] Because Warren’s claims are either procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36883 - 2009-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erroneously rejected Hunter’s claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
the circuit court erroneously rejected Hunter’s claim that a new factor warrants sentence modification. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58253 - 2010-12-27
State v. Steven J. Reinhardt
Alford[2] pleas. We reject this claim and affirm. ¶2 The criminal complaint alleged that in June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2978 - 2005-03-31
Alford[2] pleas. We reject this claim and affirm. ¶2 The criminal complaint alleged that in June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. No. 2020AP1846-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433217 - 2021-09-28
denying his postconviction claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. No. 2020AP1846-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=433217 - 2021-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 400, 407, 507 N.W.2d 378 (Ct. App. 1993).[2] As to Dansby’s claim that new factors require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30223 - 2007-09-10
. 2d 400, 407, 507 N.W.2d 378 (Ct. App. 1993).[2] As to Dansby’s claim that new factors require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30223 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for plea withdrawal and the motion for reconsideration that followed. Gordon claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70084 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion for plea withdrawal and the motion for reconsideration that followed. Gordon claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70084 - 2014-09-15
State v. James M. Smith
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Smith was charged on February 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
claims and affirm the judgment and the order. Smith was charged on February 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are barred because Chouinard has not shown a sufficient reason for not raising his current claims in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32933 - 2008-06-04
are barred because Chouinard has not shown a sufficient reason for not raising his current claims in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32933 - 2008-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
, Tiggs claimed his original sentence structure was an “unconstitutional application” of the statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105642 - 2013-12-16
, Tiggs claimed his original sentence structure was an “unconstitutional application” of the statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105642 - 2013-12-16