Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 22031 - 22040 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Michael G.
inducements and false promises. This court rejects his arguments and affirms the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31
inducements and false promises. This court rejects his arguments and affirms the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2639 - 2005-03-31
Alan Larson v. Kleist Builders, Ltd.
into the intended escrow account. The trial court concluded that Kleist, the Larsons' contractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9515 - 2005-03-31
into the intended escrow account. The trial court concluded that Kleist, the Larsons' contractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9515 - 2005-03-31
Waushara Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Michael M.
of witnesses at that hearing. We cannot overturn a trial court’s credibility determinations. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15711 - 2005-03-31
of witnesses at that hearing. We cannot overturn a trial court’s credibility determinations. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15711 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues a new trial should be granted in the interest of justice because the admission of expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28767 - 2014-09-15
argues a new trial should be granted in the interest of justice because the admission of expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28767 - 2014-09-15
State v. James E. Gray
substance by misrepresentation, all as party to a crime, following a bench trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14819 - 2005-03-31
substance by misrepresentation, all as party to a crime, following a bench trial. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14819 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jonathon R. Torres
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6100 - 2005-03-31
and six months. Wis. Stat. § 939.50(1)(3)(i) (2003).[1] In October 2002, Torres asked the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
vehicle while intoxicated, first offense. The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
vehicle while intoxicated, first offense. The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
granting or denying a suppression motion. “[T]he findings of fact, if any, of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
granting or denying a suppression motion. “[T]he findings of fact, if any, of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The trial court said that Sanders’s crimes were “some of the most horrific and horrible sexual assaults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118824 - 2014-08-04
The trial court said that Sanders’s crimes were “some of the most horrific and horrible sexual assaults
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118824 - 2014-08-04