Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 68815 for had.
Search results 22051 - 22060 of 68815 for had.
[PDF]
State v. Germaine M. Taylor
and feloniously had sexual intercourse with the victim, S.R., who had not attained the age of sixteen years.2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21700 - 2017-09-21
and feloniously had sexual intercourse with the victim, S.R., who had not attained the age of sixteen years.2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21700 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William H. Jones
” and then “had him go up to the Intoxilyzer, because it was ready to go.” Jones was physically placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21
” and then “had him go up to the Intoxilyzer, because it was ready to go.” Jones was physically placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21
City of Waukesha v. Kathleen M. Allen
for lack of probable cause, unaware of the fact that she had since been convicted for a second OWI. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14005 - 2005-03-31
for lack of probable cause, unaware of the fact that she had since been convicted for a second OWI. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14005 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert M. James
feel like you had any choice in that matter? A. Not at all. James’ testimony of what occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
feel like you had any choice in that matter? A. Not at all. James’ testimony of what occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank Ithier
in two victims’ accounts. First, he points out that one of the victims had actually experienced abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12401 - 2005-03-31
in two victims’ accounts. First, he points out that one of the victims had actually experienced abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12401 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Lintz
for a new trial based on the claim that he had not knowingly waived his right to be represented by counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
for a new trial based on the claim that he had not knowingly waived his right to be represented by counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Melvin L. Alicea
or forfeitures or his HTO status. He claimed that because his license had not been suspended or revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13839 - 2014-09-15
or forfeitures or his HTO status. He claimed that because his license had not been suspended or revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13839 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
: (1) whether McIntyre’s no contest plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered and had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98494 - 2013-06-25
: (1) whether McIntyre’s no contest plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered and had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98494 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
State v. James R. Schiller
of a firearm as a felon,1 alleged that Schiller had been convicted of a felony in 1990. It further alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2574 - 2017-09-19
of a firearm as a felon,1 alleged that Schiller had been convicted of a felony in 1990. It further alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2574 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for this action was that the United States Supreme Court had ruled that the legal theory under which Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149162 - 2017-09-21
for this action was that the United States Supreme Court had ruled that the legal theory under which Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149162 - 2017-09-21