Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22061 - 22070 of 70138 for his.
Search results 22061 - 22070 of 70138 for his.
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5112 - 2017-09-19
. Affirmed. ¶1 PETERSON, J. 1 Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5112 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tomas Consuegra
. The court entered the judgment on Consuegra’s guilty plea. In his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11391 - 2017-09-19
. The court entered the judgment on Consuegra’s guilty plea. In his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11391 - 2017-09-19
State v. Keith A. Hewitt
criminal and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He contends: (1) that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18685 - 2005-06-22
criminal and an order denying his motion for a new trial. He contends: (1) that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18685 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102506 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion for a new trial. He argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102506 - 2017-09-21
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider the court’s default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5113 - 2005-03-31
PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider the court’s default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5113 - 2005-03-31
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider the court’s default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
PETERSON, J.[1] Daniel J. Hart appeals orders denying his motion to reconsider the court’s default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5112 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marlon Spears
denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12039 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. The issue is whether his trial counsel was ineffective by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12039 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual intercourse with him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29943 - 2007-08-08
did not support the jury’s finding that his victim did not consent to sexual intercourse with him. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29943 - 2007-08-08
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
concluding there is no arguable basis for Winarski to withdraw his no contest pleas or challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92170 - 2014-09-15
concluding there is no arguable basis for Winarski to withdraw his no contest pleas or challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92170 - 2014-09-15