Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22061 - 22070 of 58333 for speedy trial.
Search results 22061 - 22070 of 58333 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Nathan Gillis v. Gary McCaughtry
officials’ motion to dismiss, and that he alleged sufficient facts to entitle him to a trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13957 - 2014-09-15
officials’ motion to dismiss, and that he alleged sufficient facts to entitle him to a trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13957 - 2014-09-15
John R. Ammerman v. Paddy A. Hauden
damages. ¶9 Eventually a trial was scheduled for January 23, 2002. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6790 - 2005-03-31
damages. ¶9 Eventually a trial was scheduled for January 23, 2002. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6790 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Howard M. v. Jean R.
, the No. 94-0955 -2- guardian. The second issue is whether sufficient evidence supported the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7832 - 2017-09-19
, the No. 94-0955 -2- guardian. The second issue is whether sufficient evidence supported the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7832 - 2017-09-19
Howard M. v. Jean R.
, in this case, the guardian. The second issue is whether sufficient evidence supported the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7832 - 2005-03-31
, in this case, the guardian. The second issue is whether sufficient evidence supported the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7832 - 2005-03-31
Richard Bender v. Town of Kronenwetter
contractual and equitable theories of law. The Bender Group argues that (1) they are entitled to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4937 - 2005-03-31
contractual and equitable theories of law. The Bender Group argues that (1) they are entitled to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4937 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cesar Farias-Mendoza
: (1) the trial court erroneously denied his suppression motion; and (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25380 - 2017-09-21
: (1) the trial court erroneously denied his suppression motion; and (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25380 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The three cases were joined for trial[4] and Reveles was tried for six counts of sexual assault involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35370 - 2009-01-28
The three cases were joined for trial[4] and Reveles was tried for six counts of sexual assault involving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35370 - 2009-01-28
[PDF]
John R. Ammerman v. Paddy A. Hauden
punitive damages. ¶9 Eventually a trial was scheduled for January 23, 2002. Before the trial began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6790 - 2017-09-20
punitive damages. ¶9 Eventually a trial was scheduled for January 23, 2002. Before the trial began
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6790 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
that the trial court erred in granting Dr. Jean-Claude’s motion for summary judgment because material issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20970 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred in granting Dr. Jean-Claude’s motion for summary judgment because material issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20970 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cesar Farias-Mendoza
for resentencing. Farias-Mendoza argues: (1) the trial court erroneously denied his suppression motion; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25380 - 2006-07-25
for resentencing. Farias-Mendoza argues: (1) the trial court erroneously denied his suppression motion; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25380 - 2006-07-25