Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22071 - 22080 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22071 - 22080 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
pled no contest to the hit and run on July 23, 2002. ¶4 Lechner filed a claim against Ehmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
pled no contest to the hit and run on July 23, 2002. ¶4 Lechner filed a claim against Ehmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
State v. Eureka Scruggs
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in December 2016, seeking a new trial based on claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
in December 2016, seeking a new trial based on claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Lasky
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174373 - 2017-09-21
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Lasky
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174373 - 2017-09-21
Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
the merits of any other claims raised by Brown County. BACKGROUND ¶2 Teamsters Local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
the merits of any other claims raised by Brown County. BACKGROUND ¶2 Teamsters Local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Because we conclude that his claims are procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75105 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. Because we conclude that his claims are procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75105 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tracy L. Singleton
] Singleton claims the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2006-08-28
] Singleton claims the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2006-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
State v. Robert M. H.
raise many issues, he does not claim that T. was age thirteen or older. We assume, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31
raise many issues, he does not claim that T. was age thirteen or older. We assume, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael S. Jakubowski v. NEVAC, Inc.
court. ¶2 The Jakubowskis brought suit against Badger, among others, alleging claims against Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3268 - 2017-09-19
court. ¶2 The Jakubowskis brought suit against Badger, among others, alleging claims against Badger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3268 - 2017-09-19