Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22071 - 22080 of 68517 for did.
Search results 22071 - 22080 of 68517 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reference during opening argument to a victim who did not testify. We affirm. ¶2 A familiar test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
reference during opening argument to a victim who did not testify. We affirm. ¶2 A familiar test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acidosis,” which in turn led to brain swelling. S.K.H. did not have any skull fractures caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306087 - 2020-11-19
acidosis,” which in turn led to brain swelling. S.K.H. did not have any skull fractures caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306087 - 2020-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth L. Moucha
a felony charge. The parties did not discuss sentencing recommendations, and no conditions other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13322 - 2017-09-21
a felony charge. The parties did not discuss sentencing recommendations, and no conditions other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony at issue, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23
the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony at issue, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
157 (1994).3 Rogers did not appeal. In July 2018, Rogers filed the WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238135 - 2019-03-25
157 (1994).3 Rogers did not appeal. In July 2018, Rogers filed the WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238135 - 2019-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Xavier Lorenzo Brown
and that the trial court did not impose an unduly harsh sentence. Therefore, we affirm. Brown and his co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
and that the trial court did not impose an unduly harsh sentence. Therefore, we affirm. Brown and his co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
telling him where they thought he was lying, and eventually, [Brent] did make statements. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32636 - 2014-09-15
telling him where they thought he was lying, and eventually, [Brent] did make statements. When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
because it concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
because it concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Al Belmore v. Department of Industry
interpretation of the rule. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10368 - 2017-09-20
interpretation of the rule. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10368 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for good cause. Moreover, C.W. did not object to the extensions. Therefore, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177488 - 2017-09-21
for good cause. Moreover, C.W. did not object to the extensions. Therefore, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177488 - 2017-09-21