Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22071 - 22080 of 70138 for his.
Search results 22071 - 22080 of 70138 for his.
[PDF]
NOTICE
Kieleszewski about his correspondence with the adult sister of the twelve-year-old victim. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26931 - 2014-09-15
Kieleszewski about his correspondence with the adult sister of the twelve-year-old victim. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank A. Normington
¶1 PER CURIAM. Frank Normington appeals from an order denying his motion for relief under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3141 - 2017-09-19
¶1 PER CURIAM. Frank Normington appeals from an order denying his motion for relief under WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3141 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul Williams
in that area. His clothing closely matched the description of the masked perpetrator, and he had a black ski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11994 - 2017-09-21
in that area. His clothing closely matched the description of the masked perpetrator, and he had a black ski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl A. Knoll
for the offense—specifically whether there was probable cause to believe Knoll was operating his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13104 - 2017-09-21
for the offense—specifically whether there was probable cause to believe Knoll was operating his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Shaw
rights were violated when the trial court changed his sentence from eighteen months in the county jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15120 - 2017-09-21
rights were violated when the trial court changed his sentence from eighteen months in the county jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion. The issue is whether he should have received an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
his postconviction motion. The issue is whether he should have received an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
). No. 01-1720-CR 2 (1999-2000). 2 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4118 - 2017-09-20
). No. 01-1720-CR 2 (1999-2000). 2 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4118 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Dykman, Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Larkin appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23
. Before Dykman, Lundsten and Bridge, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Mark Larkin appeals an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33502 - 2008-07-23
State v. Charles E. Snodgrass
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4163 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy D. Lewis
to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.19(1), 939.63, and 947.01 (1999-2000).[2] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.19(1), 939.63, and 947.01 (1999-2000).[2] He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4118 - 2005-03-31