Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22081 - 22090 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22081 - 22090 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Maurice Simmons
, however, did pursue the coercion argument, and he testified in support of his claim.[2] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
, however, did pursue the coercion argument, and he testified in support of his claim.[2] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
State v. Eureka Scruggs
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in December 2016, seeking a new trial based on claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
in December 2016, seeking a new trial based on claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
Peter N. Pappas v. John R. Huxhold
on the entire property. At the outset, we address Huxhold's claim that the question of whether an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9437 - 2017-09-19
on the entire property. At the outset, we address Huxhold's claim that the question of whether an agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9437 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Lasky
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174373 - 2017-09-21
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. State v. Lasky
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174373 - 2017-09-21
Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
the merits of any other claims raised by Brown County. BACKGROUND ¶2 Teamsters Local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
the merits of any other claims raised by Brown County. BACKGROUND ¶2 Teamsters Local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Because we conclude that his claims are procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75105 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. Because we conclude that his claims are procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75105 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tracy L. Singleton
] Singleton claims the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2006-08-28
] Singleton claims the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26300 - 2006-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
an order denying his claim for double his security deposit, costs, and attorney fees, and granting Jeff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30681 - 2007-10-22
State v. Robert M. H.
raise many issues, he does not claim that T. was age thirteen or older. We assume, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31
raise many issues, he does not claim that T. was age thirteen or older. We assume, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13216 - 2005-03-31

