Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22081 - 22090 of 29712 for des.
Search results 22081 - 22090 of 29712 for des.
State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts—which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11601 - 2011-10-19
of statutes and their application to the facts—which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11601 - 2011-10-19
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted). This is a question of law we review de novo “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06
. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62 (citation omitted). This is a question of law we review de novo “based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David Beilfuss v. Huffy Corporation
. No. 03-2006 4 Interpretation of a contract is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6718 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-2006 4 Interpretation of a contract is a question of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6718 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
are affirmed unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212847 - 2018-05-16
are affirmed unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212847 - 2018-05-16
[PDF]
Martin Riddell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
the grant of summary judgment de novo, Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13289 - 2017-09-21
the grant of summary judgment de novo, Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315-16, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13289 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert E. Ervin v. Great West Casualty Company
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed by the circuit court. Smith v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13893 - 2014-09-15
summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards employed by the circuit court. Smith v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in a certain case presents a question of law that is subject to de novo review. Below v. Norton, 2008 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35894 - 2014-09-15
in a certain case presents a question of law that is subject to de novo review. Below v. Norton, 2008 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 632.32, a question of law that we review de novo. No. 2020AP1793 4 See Thom v. 1st Auto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
. § 632.32, a question of law that we review de novo. No. 2020AP1793 4 See Thom v. 1st Auto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28