Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22081 - 22090 of 50086 for our.

State v. Dean P. Lenz
content, but that does not affect our decision. [3] The “great weight and clear preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15246 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶11 Lavender challenges his sentence. Our standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-06-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 895.481. Our task in construing the statute “is to determine what [it] means so that it may be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027257 - 2025-10-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will not substitute our discretion for theirs. See id.; State ex rel. Ortega v. McCaughtry, 221 Wis. 2d 376, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261598 - 2020-05-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014857 - 2025-09-25

COURT OF APPEALS
may not substitute our discretion for that committed to the Board by the legislature, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60905 - 2011-03-15

Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. v. Jerome B. Mueller
. A. Summary judgment. Our standard of review for summary judgment questions is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9105 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on these statements when it sentenced him. Johnson directs our attention to the following sentencing remarks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240969 - 2019-05-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and his motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the No. 2019AP959-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251557 - 2019-12-17

[PDF] NOTICE
no mistrial is declared, our review … is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41625 - 2014-09-15