Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22091 - 22100 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22091 - 22100 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
modification. Without any sufficient reason to excuse his failure to include his present claims in his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107362 - 2014-01-27
modification. Without any sufficient reason to excuse his failure to include his present claims in his first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107362 - 2014-01-27
Strip-Rite, Inc. v. Todd C. Smith
’ competing unjust enrichment and business devaluation claims, except for a $2,500 pressure washer purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4520 - 2005-03-31
’ competing unjust enrichment and business devaluation claims, except for a $2,500 pressure washer purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant has misconstrued the State’s recommendation: “Defendant’s claim that the ‘[S]tate agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675657 - 2023-07-05
that the defendant has misconstrued the State’s recommendation: “Defendant’s claim that the ‘[S]tate agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675657 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
Donald J. Harman v.
was retained in November 1991 to represent a client on a claim against a county and some of its officials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17255 - 2017-09-21
was retained in November 1991 to represent a client on a claim against a county and some of its officials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17255 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in part and affirm in part, and remand for a hearing on Procknow’s claim that he did not enter a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
in part and affirm in part, and remand for a hearing on Procknow’s claim that he did not enter a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34263 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
, which the circuit court interpreted as claiming consecutive sentences were unduly harsh. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
, which the circuit court interpreted as claiming consecutive sentences were unduly harsh. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS
pled no contest to the hit and run on July 23, 2002. ¶4 Lechner filed a claim against Ehmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
pled no contest to the hit and run on July 23, 2002. ¶4 Lechner filed a claim against Ehmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
] Hendrickson also claims trial counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143091 - 2015-06-15
] Hendrickson also claims trial counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143091 - 2015-06-15
State v. Maurice Simmons
, however, did pursue the coercion argument, and he testified in support of his claim.[2] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
, however, did pursue the coercion argument, and he testified in support of his claim.[2] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
State v. Eureka Scruggs
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31