Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22091 - 22100 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22091 - 22100 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
contract and a statute; thus, our review is de novo. Martin, 146 Wis. 2d at 766, West Bend Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
contract and a statute; thus, our review is de novo. Martin, 146 Wis. 2d at 766, West Bend Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32631 - 2008-05-05
Ruth Johnson v. County of Crawford
of law, which this court decides de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. Tahtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8517 - 2005-03-31
of law, which this court decides de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination. Tahtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8517 - 2005-03-31
Robert D. and Lorraine Jacobs v. Nor-Lake, Inc.
is de novo. Id. at 434, 556 N.W.2d at 399. After examining the pleadings to determine that a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12628 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. Id. at 434, 556 N.W.2d at 399. After examining the pleadings to determine that a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12628 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81178 - 2012-04-18
of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81178 - 2012-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 10, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09
prejudiced the defendant are legal questions we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114116 - 2014-06-09
Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d 513, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. See, e.g., State v. Migliorino, 150 Wis.2d 513, 524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
State v. Elmer J. K.
to engage in contract interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31
to engage in contract interpretation. Construction of a contract is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to Reifenberg occurred, it was not an unambiguous rejection of Foremost’s offer. ¶10 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
to Reifenberg occurred, it was not an unambiguous rejection of Foremost’s offer. ¶10 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43919 - 2009-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
employ the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77594 - 2012-02-07
employ the same methodology as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Springs Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77594 - 2012-02-07