Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22091 - 22100 of 68502 for did.

County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
granted the motion because it concluded that the police did not have probable cause to arrest. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the testimony at issue, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23

State v. Michael V. Hendricks
court for his motion.[4] On January 23, 2002, Hendricks did not appear in court, but his father did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5209 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
credibility or competency. Here, however, defense counsel did not argue that Sersted was entitled to in camera
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108289 - 2014-02-18

WI App 115 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP2368 Complete Title o...
the statute of frauds as it was “too indefinite,” and following a trial, found that Alice did not breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86701 - 2013-01-15

State v. Jerry W. Krueger
that the trial court did not err in finding that Krueger failed to meet his burden that he was physically unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15755 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
in the stomach if she did not listen to him. Ochoa was charged in July 2006 with one count of repeated sexual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135181 - 2015-02-12

Phone Partners Limited Partnership v. C.F. Communications Corporation
conclude that the trial court did not misuse its discretion when it refused to conduct an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8061 - 2005-03-31

Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
an attorney-client relationship existed when the statute of limitations expired. The trial court found it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20975 - 2006-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to object to the prosecutor’s reference during opening argument to a victim who did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98373 - 2013-06-24