Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Judi L. Stratil v. David J. Stratil
post-judgment motion for a change of placement and custody. We conclude that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13164 - 2017-09-21
post-judgment motion for a change of placement and custody. We conclude that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13164 - 2017-09-21
State v. John R. Stambaugh
and, further, that the trial court should have credited him with time served in federal custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
and, further, that the trial court should have credited him with time served in federal custody. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11922 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Throndson understood the maximum penalties for each offense and that the court was not bound by the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15
that Throndson understood the maximum penalties for each offense and that the court was not bound by the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15
State v. Alfred Sharpe
from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. The issue is whether equal protection compels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7716 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. The issue is whether equal protection compels
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7716 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
matter jurisdiction to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
matter jurisdiction to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence of a court” satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10906 - 2017-09-20
to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence of a court” satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10906 - 2017-09-20
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
an unsuccessful motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In April 2013, the parties filed cross-motions
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=868&year=2017
an unsuccessful motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In April 2013, the parties filed cross-motions
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=868&year=2017
CA Blank Order
, and a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141509 - 2015-05-06
, and a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141509 - 2015-05-06
Rhonda Brown v. Curtis-Universal Inc.
. On July 16, 1997, the City filed a motion to dismiss Curtis’s third-party contribution complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13151 - 2005-03-31
. On July 16, 1997, the City filed a motion to dismiss Curtis’s third-party contribution complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13151 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert N. Pendleton
motion to withdraw his plea. Pendleton contends that the trial court failed to advise him that sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11232 - 2005-03-31
motion to withdraw his plea. Pendleton contends that the trial court failed to advise him that sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11232 - 2005-03-31