Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 68485 for did.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not seized, then the officer did not need reasonable suspicion to approach his vehicle. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
was not seized, then the officer did not need reasonable suspicion to approach his vehicle. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues: (1) that the complaint did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30407 - 2014-09-15
argues: (1) that the complaint did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30407 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
as a sex offender in 2009. He did not file a direct appeal from his conviction. On November 28, 2011, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92964 - 2013-02-19
as a sex offender in 2009. He did not file a direct appeal from his conviction. On November 28, 2011, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92964 - 2013-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Rice
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9120 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with OMVWI subsequent to a traffic stop on March 29, 2012. Ardell did not appear at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92329 - 2013-02-05
was charged with OMVWI subsequent to a traffic stop on March 29, 2012. Ardell did not appear at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92329 - 2013-02-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory No. 2008AP2418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35484 - 2014-09-15
that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory No. 2008AP2418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35484 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bruce Hoefs
. Hoefs argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8223 - 2005-03-31
. Hoefs argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8223 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
presented in the complaint did not support a charge of attempted escape because they did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19
presented in the complaint did not support a charge of attempted escape because they did not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3181 - 2017-09-19