Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 68466 for did.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 68466 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
motion because it did not adopt the statutory presumption that there has been a substantial change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35484 - 2009-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73689 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with OMVWI subsequent to a traffic stop on March 29, 2012. Ardell did not appear at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92329 - 2013-02-05
was charged with OMVWI subsequent to a traffic stop on March 29, 2012. Ardell did not appear at the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92329 - 2013-02-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory No. 2008AP2418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35484 - 2014-09-15
that the family court erred when it denied his motion because it did not adopt the statutory No. 2008AP2418
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35484 - 2014-09-15
Shirell Watkins, Sr. v. Gerald A. Berge
to prepare his defense. The sealed submission did not hamper the circuit court’s review of the certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
to prepare his defense. The sealed submission did not hamper the circuit court’s review of the certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
State v. Michael J. Rice
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
jail. He contends that he was denied due process of law because he did not have the proper opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9120 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Hoefs
. Hoefs argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8223 - 2005-03-31
. Hoefs argues that the court erroneously exercised its discretion because it did not consider certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8223 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain the meaning of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73689 - 2011-11-14
be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not fully explain the meaning of the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73689 - 2011-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2) that the jury instructions did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30407 - 2007-09-26
did not adequately allege all of the elements of the crime; (2) that the jury instructions did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30407 - 2007-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not file a direct appeal from his conviction. On November 28, 2011, he filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92964 - 2014-09-15
did not file a direct appeal from his conviction. On November 28, 2011, he filed a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92964 - 2014-09-15