Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 70054 for hi.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 70054 for hi.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his guilty pleas because they were not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently but instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839893 - 2024-08-20
his guilty pleas because they were not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently but instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839893 - 2024-08-20
[PDF]
State v. Brian K. Rundle
argues that: (1) the trial court compromised his right to confrontation and compulsory process when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13805 - 2014-09-15
argues that: (1) the trial court compromised his right to confrontation and compulsory process when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William H. Moody
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6398 - 2017-09-19
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6398 - 2017-09-19
State v. Todd A. Murdock
. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Todd Murdock appeals his conviction for obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15043 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J. Todd Murdock appeals his conviction for obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15043 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen M. Wolfe
appeals from an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. He contends that no factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7886 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. He contends that no factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7886 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Bruce A. Rumage v. Michael J. Sullivan
A. Rumage appeals pro se from orders denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98),1 motion and his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15977 - 2017-09-21
A. Rumage appeals pro se from orders denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (1997-98),1 motion and his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15977 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760112 - 2024-02-06
that denied his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760112 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2023-24).1 Brunette argues that the circuit court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938405 - 2025-04-08
)(a) (2023-24).1 Brunette argues that the circuit court erred by denying his pretrial motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938405 - 2025-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daniel Drow appeals an order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daniel Drow appeals an order denying his petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
as an habitual criminal. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22
as an habitual criminal. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34377 - 2008-10-22