Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 17242 for probate/1000.
Search results 2211 - 2220 of 17242 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Id., ¶37. In this case, in 2004, Goodall was sentenced after revocation of probation to a five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072060 - 2026-02-05
. Id., ¶37. In this case, in 2004, Goodall was sentenced after revocation of probation to a five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072060 - 2026-02-05
Robert W. Ganley v. Department of Corrections
on probation for ten years with various conditions. The subject of this appeal is the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12440 - 2005-03-31
on probation for ten years with various conditions. The subject of this appeal is the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12440 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Ganley
on probation for ten years with various conditions. The subject of this appeal is the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12438 - 2005-03-31
on probation for ten years with various conditions. The subject of this appeal is the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Koszewski v. David H. Schwarz
by the Division of Hearings & Appeals to revoke his probation. Koszewski claims: (1) the department engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5233 - 2017-09-19
by the Division of Hearings & Appeals to revoke his probation. Koszewski claims: (1) the department engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5233 - 2017-09-19
State v. David L. Comey
.[1] David Comey appeals a sentence imposed upon revocation of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13931 - 2005-03-31
.[1] David Comey appeals a sentence imposed upon revocation of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13931 - 2005-03-31
Robert Koszewski v. David H. Schwarz
by the Division of Hearings & Appeals to revoke his probation. Koszewski claims: (1) the department engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5233 - 2005-03-31
by the Division of Hearings & Appeals to revoke his probation. Koszewski claims: (1) the department engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
be placed on probation. But there was a proviso that “if the defendant does not successfully complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54587 - 2014-09-15
be placed on probation. But there was a proviso that “if the defendant does not successfully complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54587 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
charges and a misdemeanor bail jumping. Sentence would be withheld and he would be placed on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54587 - 2010-09-21
charges and a misdemeanor bail jumping. Sentence would be withheld and he would be placed on probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54587 - 2010-09-21
[PDF]
Albert A. Tadych v. Waukesha County
., 166 Wis. 2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836 (Ct. App. 1992). “Excusable neglect is that which might have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15668 - 2017-09-21
., 166 Wis. 2d 1000, 1006, 480 N.W.2d 836 (Ct. App. 1992). “Excusable neglect is that which might have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15668 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vernon Dansand
(1)(a) and (3)(b), Stats. (intentional carrying away of property valued between $1000 and $2500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13766 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a) and (3)(b), Stats. (intentional carrying away of property valued between $1000 and $2500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13766 - 2005-03-31