Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22101 - 22110 of 29817 for des.
Search results 22101 - 22110 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Beyer arises not from the procedure employed—Rogers was not stipulating to a de facto guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610529 - 2023-02-09
with Beyer arises not from the procedure employed—Rogers was not stipulating to a de facto guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610529 - 2023-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Rolando M. Tong
of the magistrate’s probable-cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21
of the magistrate’s probable-cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cedric Johnson
that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new factor exists, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10885 - 2017-09-20
that this court reviews de novo. Id., 150 Wis.2d at 97, 441 N.W.2d at 279. If a new factor exists, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10885 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
The Falk Corporation v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr.
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
involves an interpretation of the prior order, however, we review the trial court’s interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10837 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jeanette E. Normington v. Peter J. Normington
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16212 - 2017-09-21
on the interpretation of statutes or regulations in making its decision, we review those rulings de novo. See Weis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16212 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
the circuit court’s decision to deny a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256674 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we also review de novo. Tesker, 208 Wis. 2d at 605. Ordinance No. 785
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment is de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W.2d 843. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124906 - 2017-09-21
judgment is de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6, 306 Wis. 2d 513, 743 N.W.2d 843. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124906 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James B.
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo, however, whether the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6190 - 2017-09-19
., 179 Wis. 2d at 150, 507 N.W.2d at 107. We review de novo, however, whether the trial court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6190 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de novo whether those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216043 - 2018-07-24