Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22101 - 22110 of 57708 for id.
Search results 22101 - 22110 of 57708 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
caused him to speed. Id. at 46. Specifically, the motorist alleged the officer passed in front
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76321 - 2014-09-15
caused him to speed. Id. at 46. Specifically, the motorist alleged the officer passed in front
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with a sentence if discretion was properly exercised. See id. at 418-19. We will not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80618 - 2014-09-15
with a sentence if discretion was properly exercised. See id. at 418-19. We will not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80618 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
. Id. at 233, 501 N.W.2d at 879. “When asserting the consent exception, the State bears `the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
. Id. at 233, 501 N.W.2d at 879. “When asserting the consent exception, the State bears `the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
State v. Sheldon R.
exercised its discretion and there was a reasonable basis for the decision. Id. Stated in the converse, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4412 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion and there was a reasonable basis for the decision. Id. Stated in the converse, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4412 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Scherr
of the crime with which Scherr was charged. See id. at 136, 536 N.W.2d at 394 (prior “operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8347 - 2005-03-31
of the crime with which Scherr was charged. See id. at 136, 536 N.W.2d at 394 (prior “operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ordering a mistrial over Rodebaugh’s objection. See id., ¶19. If Rodebaugh’s trial was terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80353 - 2014-09-15
for ordering a mistrial over Rodebaugh’s objection. See id., ¶19. If Rodebaugh’s trial was terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Id. at 694. A reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194577 - 2017-09-21
that, but for counsel’s errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Id. at 694. A reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194577 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
). Whether the facts, as found, warrant suppression of the evidence, however, is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39337 - 2014-09-15
). Whether the facts, as found, warrant suppression of the evidence, however, is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39337 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was a manifest necessity for ordering a mistrial over Rodebaugh’s objection. See id., ¶19. If Rodebaugh’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80353 - 2012-04-04
that there was a manifest necessity for ordering a mistrial over Rodebaugh’s objection. See id., ¶19. If Rodebaugh’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80353 - 2012-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is not entitled to relief,” the circuit court has the discretion to deny the motion. Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04
is not entitled to relief,” the circuit court has the discretion to deny the motion. Id. (citations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197352 - 2017-10-04