Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22111 - 22120 of 29712 for des.
Search results 22111 - 22120 of 29712 for des.
Orville Oney v. Wolfgang Schrauth
review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8386 - 2005-03-31
review de novo, by applying the same standards employed by the trial court. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19
State v. Frederick F. Hafemann
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
of reasonableness is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Whitrock, 161 Wis.2d 960, 973, 468 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8994 - 2005-03-31
Diane Haddican-Czestler v. Mitchell J. Barrock
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2013-11-19
review questions of law de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13587 - 2013-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
and did not return her to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18
and did not return her to the facility. The corporation counsel decided not to contest the de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29415 - 2007-06-18
2007 WI APP 169
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Sections 5 and 7 of article I of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29338 - 2007-07-24
of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶12 Sections 5 and 7 of article I of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29338 - 2007-07-24
2008 WI APP 108
and the application of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32918 - 2015-08-10
and the application of a statute to specific facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Marotz v. Hallman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32918 - 2015-08-10
2011 WI APP 33
judgment de novo using the same standard and methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2013-03-29
judgment de novo using the same standard and methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59802 - 2013-03-29
[PDF]
State v. Scott Michael Harwood
; however, our application of the law to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
; however, our application of the law to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6031 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ronald Ransdell
is de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121 (1995), cert. denied, 521 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2925 - 2011-11-20
is de novo. State v. Post, 197 Wis. 2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121 (1995), cert. denied, 521 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2925 - 2011-11-20