Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22111 - 22120 of 41929 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 22111 - 22120 of 41929 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
from the jury, because Hagen’s answer to defense counsel’s question showed manifest bias. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15512 - 2017-09-21
from the jury, because Hagen’s answer to defense counsel’s question showed manifest bias. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15512 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interest of justice. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following a jury trial in 2007, Hicks was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
in the interest of justice. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Following a jury trial in 2007, Hicks was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2012-12-10
State v. Gary E. Wolfgram
. As a result, Wolfgram’s next to last testimony before the jury was “I did cut them for him,” arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11435 - 2005-03-31
. As a result, Wolfgram’s next to last testimony before the jury was “I did cut them for him,” arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11435 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the circuit court to conduct a jury trial on the grounds phase of the TPR proceedings. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455289 - 2021-11-18
for the circuit court to conduct a jury trial on the grounds phase of the TPR proceedings. BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455289 - 2021-11-18
State v. John Foster Fant
appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. According to the State, the jury was not given an actual malice instruction and the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112698 - 2014-05-21
. According to the State, the jury was not given an actual malice instruction and the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112698 - 2014-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Don Allan Ray Dougan appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50535 - 2010-06-01
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Don Allan Ray Dougan appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50535 - 2010-06-01
State v. Marquis O. Gilliam
Marc Hagen from the jury, because Hagen’s answer to defense counsel’s question showed manifest bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
Marc Hagen from the jury, because Hagen’s answer to defense counsel’s question showed manifest bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrence L. Webb
from a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of four counts of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10964 - 2017-09-19
from a judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of four counts of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10964 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Frank
and motive. A jury 2 In State v. Wallerman, 203 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3944 - 2017-09-20
and motive. A jury 2 In State v. Wallerman, 203 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3944 - 2017-09-20