Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22121 - 22130 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22121 - 22130 of 29823 for des.
State v. Joshua Slagoski
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
of law we review de novo. State v. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d 94, 97, 441 N.W.2d 278 (Ct. App. 1989). A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tom Sweeney
Sweeney's counsel was making "all of the arguments available to him," it "ma[de] no sense" for him to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
Sweeney's counsel was making "all of the arguments available to him," it "ma[de] no sense" for him to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v. Bobby G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95354 - 2013-04-10
[PDF]
Hans S. Pawlisch v. The Otto V. Pawlisch Trust for Carl V. Pawlisch
, ¶10, 260 Wis. 2d 815, 660 N.W.2d 308. Despite this de novo standard of review, we value the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6531 - 2017-09-19
, ¶10, 260 Wis. 2d 815, 660 N.W.2d 308. Despite this de novo standard of review, we value the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6531 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jacqee R. Anderson
de novo review. See id. at 310. If we conclude that Anderson’s motion fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21
de novo review. See id. at 310. If we conclude that Anderson’s motion fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 4
of law we review de novo. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. LIRC, 2018 WI 76, ¶29, 382 Wis. 2d 624, 914 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311702 - 2021-02-08
of law we review de novo. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. LIRC, 2018 WI 76, ¶29, 382 Wis. 2d 624, 914 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=311702 - 2021-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and emphasis omitted). We review de novo whether a motion entitles a defendant to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240533 - 2019-05-14
and emphasis omitted). We review de novo whether a motion entitles a defendant to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240533 - 2019-05-14
[PDF]
WI APP 14
we review de novo. See Kraus, 261 Wis. 2d 485, ¶10. To the extent that the Housing Authority may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
we review de novo. See Kraus, 261 Wis. 2d 485, ¶10. To the extent that the Housing Authority may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey Busshardt
of the resisting charge and asked for a de novo hearing under § 800.14(4), STATS. Busshardt argues, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9131 - 2017-09-19
of the resisting charge and asked for a de novo hearing under § 800.14(4), STATS. Busshardt argues, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9131 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 96
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36685 - 2014-09-15