Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22121 - 22130 of 29713 for des.
Search results 22121 - 22130 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133310 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo. Chapman v. B.C. Ziegler & Co., 2013 WI App 127, ¶2, 351 Wis. 2d 123, 839 N.W.2d 425
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
642, 734 N.W.2d 115 (citations omitted). We review a trial court’s own harmless-error conclusion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31759 - 2014-09-15
642, 734 N.W.2d 115 (citations omitted). We review a trial court’s own harmless-error conclusion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31759 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 190
. That resentencing is the subject of this appeal. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
. That resentencing is the subject of this appeal. DISCUSSION ¶4 We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29712 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
N.W.2d at 339. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91094 - 2013-01-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the admission of evidence violates a defendant’s right to confrontation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06
the admission of evidence violates a defendant’s right to confrontation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard governing the reasonableness of a search is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120980 - 2014-09-15
standard governing the reasonableness of a search is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Ronald C. Kleutgen v. Robert A. McFadyen, Jr.
of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial court’s determinations as to what the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
of law, which we review de novo. Applied here, the trial court’s determinations as to what the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20079 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107968 - 2017-09-21
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶18 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We consider de novo whether a postconviction “motion on its face
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. We consider de novo whether a postconviction “motion on its face
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Rolando M. Tong
of the magistrate’s probable-cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21
of the magistrate’s probable-cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12964 - 2017-09-21