Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22121 - 22130 of 73716 for ha.

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. John H. Newkirk
experience, that some kind of criminal activity has taken or is taking place. See State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2142 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at the documents, only looking at the … insurance policy. But summary judgment certainly has been used to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168144 - 2017-09-21

State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
that it has no effect whatsoever. After the court’s ruling, Czarnecki used a peremptory strike to remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14408 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kevin M. Boon
the Court has reviewed prior to today’s date that was [sic] mentioned of record today are not applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5992 - 2017-09-19

State v. Frederick Harvey
). A trial court’s findings of historical fact relevant to whether a violation of a constitutional right has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6681 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert D. Stewart
was in the ditch. Stewart has provided this court with no authority for the proposition that an officer cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3594 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert Thomas Urbanec
that the trial court properly denied Urbanec’s request. A trial court has wide discretion regarding jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13621 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
2 Haushalter has asked that this decision be published. One-judge appeals are not publishable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15125 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael W. Booth v. American States Insurance Company
constitutes a certificate that the attorney or party has read the pleading, motion or other paper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9088 - 2017-09-19

Sharon M. Blomdahl v. Corey C. Blomdahl
that she’s agreed to which would have resulted in child support much greater than has been agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6507 - 2005-03-31