Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22121 - 22130 of 46967 for show's.

COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing bears the burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a fair and just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132115 - 2014-12-22

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
counsel, however, was later allowed to show the videotape of that meeting to the jury and N.A
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Aristole E. Farmer, Jr.
not qualify Farmer for ch. 980 commitment; (4) the primary actuarial instrument used to show Farmer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3459 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Scott F. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
to try two cases today. Mr. Anderson shows up late.” Attorney Anderson was then given an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 152
). Teasdale presented no evidence, through testimony or otherwise, to show his failure to earn a single
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40925 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel Aguilar
is unavailable because his or her attendance could not be procured, the prosecutor must make a showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. The State also played the gas station surveillance video for the jury at trial. The video shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06

State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
). To prove deficient performance, a defendant must show specific acts or omissions of counsel which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Bartz
court unless the defendant meets his or her burden of showing an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9572 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing only upon a showing of ‘manifest injustice’ by clear and convincing evidence.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153600 - 2017-09-21