Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22131 - 22140 of 65039 for or b.
Search results 22131 - 22140 of 65039 for or b.
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
, for evidence of criminal contempt in violation of §§ 785.03(1)(b) and 785.01, Stats., and of theft in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12919 - 2005-03-31
, for evidence of criminal contempt in violation of §§ 785.03(1)(b) and 785.01, Stats., and of theft in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12919 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy was not violated. B. New Factor ¶12 Haizel also contends that the DOC’s failure to place him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
jeopardy was not violated. B. New Factor ¶12 Haizel also contends that the DOC’s failure to place him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372580 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
meritorious challenge to the contempt order. B. Frivolous Appeal ¶15 The County seeks costs, fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
meritorious challenge to the contempt order. B. Frivolous Appeal ¶15 The County seeks costs, fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79552 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-17
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is suitable for children.” Sec. 948.11(1)(b)1.-2. No. 2021AP711-CR 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 948.11(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25
is suitable for children.” Sec. 948.11(1)(b)1.-2. No. 2021AP711-CR 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 948.11(2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524367 - 2022-05-25
CA Blank Order
)(b), (2). Our review also establishes that the petition was in proper form. No issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108418 - 2014-02-25
)(b), (2). Our review also establishes that the petition was in proper form. No issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108418 - 2014-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54574 - 2010-09-22
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54574 - 2010-09-22
[PDF]
State v. Carol A. Davis
of a school in violation of §§ 161.16(2)(b), 161.41(1m)(c)1, 161.49 and 939.05, STATS., 1991-92. The sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8279 - 2017-09-19
of a school in violation of §§ 161.16(2)(b), 161.41(1m)(c)1, 161.49 and 939.05, STATS., 1991-92. The sole
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8279 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that error on appeal.”). B. Officer Milotzky’s testimony. ¶11 Krueger next argues that Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56774 - 2014-09-15
that error on appeal.”). B. Officer Milotzky’s testimony. ¶11 Krueger next argues that Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56774 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
a probable cause hearing. See §§ 51.15(4)(b) and 51.20(7)(a), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15
a probable cause hearing. See §§ 51.15(4)(b) and 51.20(7)(a), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14050 - 2014-09-15