Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22131 - 22140 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 22131 - 22140 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Danny A. Reynolds
because the judge who sentenced him after revocation, who was not the judge who presided over the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3641 - 2017-09-19
because the judge who sentenced him after revocation, who was not the judge who presided over the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3641 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Stout
“no.” That is the extent of it and we reverse the trial court’s holding to the contrary. We remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
“no.” That is the extent of it and we reverse the trial court’s holding to the contrary. We remand with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3803 - 2017-09-20
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
. Robinson appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. Robinson argued that the search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=153&year=2009
. Robinson appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. Robinson argued that the search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=153&year=2009
State v. David Hayes
of a child, and from an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. In sentencing Hayes, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9224 - 2005-03-31
of a child, and from an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. In sentencing Hayes, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9224 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
contended that his trial counsel had ineffectively represented him. Sallay made no request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10379 - 2005-03-31
contended that his trial counsel had ineffectively represented him. Sallay made no request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10379 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Krohn
that the trial court erred when it did not suppress evidence of crimes found by the police during a warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14817 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it did not suppress evidence of crimes found by the police during a warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Krohn
that the trial court erred when it did not suppress evidence of crimes found by the police during a warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14816 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it did not suppress evidence of crimes found by the police during a warrantless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14816 - 2017-09-21
State v. James E. Thomas
, 939.05, Stats. He appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31
, 939.05, Stats. He appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14398 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Kruse
. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed person
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20654 - 2005-12-14
. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed person
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20654 - 2005-12-14
Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation v. James Eisold
a judgment which awarded $102,504.35 to MEDC. The appellants contend that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10476 - 2005-03-31
a judgment which awarded $102,504.35 to MEDC. The appellants contend that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10476 - 2005-03-31