Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 59238 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 59238 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
claims centered on the contention that Hainstock was not competent to waive his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
claims centered on the contention that Hainstock was not competent to waive his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
COURT OF APPEALS
pled no contest to the hit and run on July 23, 2002. ¶4 Lechner filed a claim against Ehmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
pled no contest to the hit and run on July 23, 2002. ¶4 Lechner filed a claim against Ehmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 311. ¶10 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
. Id. at 311. ¶10 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104346 - 2013-11-19
COURT OF APPEALS
misconduct. He claimed that his counsel failed to call four witnesses at trial that would have given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
misconduct. He claimed that his counsel failed to call four witnesses at trial that would have given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53150 - 2010-08-10
State v. Jason R. Brown
his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the lineup at which the victim identified him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15155 - 2005-03-31
his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the lineup at which the victim identified him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15155 - 2005-03-31
Christina L. Dahlen v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.
of the circuit court dismissing her claims.[1] Troftgruben contends the court erred when it gave the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20959 - 2006-01-17
of the circuit court dismissing her claims.[1] Troftgruben contends the court erred when it gave the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20959 - 2006-01-17
COURT OF APPEALS
] Hendrickson also claims trial counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143091 - 2015-06-15
] Hendrickson also claims trial counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge expert testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143091 - 2015-06-15
State v. Maurice Simmons
, however, did pursue the coercion argument, and he testified in support of his claim.[2] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
, however, did pursue the coercion argument, and he testified in support of his claim.[2] ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
State v. Eureka Scruggs
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
motion, which sought sentence modification. She claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11998 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in December 2016, seeking a new trial based on claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
in December 2016, seeking a new trial based on claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06