Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 30242 for de.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 30242 for de.
State v. Robert Koch
, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15823 - 2005-03-31
, 595 N.W.2d 403 (1999). ¶13 Appellate review of a bindover decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15823 - 2005-03-31
Ronald Binon v. Great Northern Insurance Company
a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision on such a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12193 - 2005-03-31
a question of law which we review de novo, we nevertheless value a trial court’s decision on such a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12193 - 2005-03-31
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
of law that we review de novo. See Davies v. Heiman, 186 Wis.2d 370, 376, 520 N.W.2d 917, 919 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See Davies v. Heiman, 186 Wis.2d 370, 376, 520 N.W.2d 917, 919 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott E. Fuller
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which [we] review[] de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20219 - 2005-11-09
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which [we] review[] de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20219 - 2005-11-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
clearly erroneous, we uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact, and we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247408 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and sewer repairs and attendant disruption to the neighborhood, which was located along a cul-de-sac. H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
and sewer repairs and attendant disruption to the neighborhood, which was located along a cul-de-sac. H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15
unless clearly erroneous but reviewing de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Tee & Bee, Inc. v. City of West Allis
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis.2d 112, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11161 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Kruzicki, 209 Wis.2d 112, 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Yehuda Elmakias v. Michael Wayda
of law that we review de novo. See Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Because the inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14769 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. See Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Because the inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14769 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
judgment motions de novo. See Sawyer v. Midelfort, 217 Wis.2d 795, 804, 579 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14199 - 2014-09-15
judgment motions de novo. See Sawyer v. Midelfort, 217 Wis.2d 795, 804, 579 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14199 - 2014-09-15