Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 29821 for des.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 29821 for des.
WI App 109 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1802 Complete Title of ...
a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65781 - 2011-07-25
a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65781 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
WI 17
to determine if they are clearly erroneous, and we must review de novo its conclusions of law regarding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961978 - 2025-05-27
to determine if they are clearly erroneous, and we must review de novo its conclusions of law regarding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961978 - 2025-05-27
Walsh Apartments, LLC v. Mac-Gray Co., Inc.
we review de novo. First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251 (1977
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3582 - 2012-07-24
we review de novo. First Nat’l Leasing Corp. v. Madison, 81 Wis. 2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251 (1977
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3582 - 2012-07-24
Brittany Frost v. Doreen Whitbeck
Standard of Review. ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3579 - 2012-07-24
Standard of Review. ¶6 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3579 - 2012-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
solely at a question of law. We review questions of law de novo. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63999 - 2014-09-15
solely at a question of law. We review questions of law de novo. United Rentals, Inc. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of statutory interpretation, reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Lockman v. Gerhardstein, 107 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-15
is a question of statutory interpretation, reviewed de novo. State ex rel. Lockman v. Gerhardstein, 107 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id., ¶12. No. 2022AP655-CR 8 ¶20 Vandervere asserts that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
of law we review de novo. Id., ¶12. No. 2022AP655-CR 8 ¶20 Vandervere asserts that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
of law based on those facts, de novo. See Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp., 90 Wis.2d 700, 713, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
of law based on those facts, de novo. See Department of Revenue v. Exxon Corp., 90 Wis.2d 700, 713, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15
reviews de novo. See State v. Mendoza, 227 Wis.2d 838, 849, 596 N.W.2d 736, 742 (1999). We follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14408 - 2014-09-15