Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 22141 - 22150 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
violated a plain duty under then-existing law in appointing Attorney Schmitz. Accordingly, this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156523 - 2017-09-21
violated a plain duty under then-existing law in appointing Attorney Schmitz. Accordingly, this court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156523 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
officials. We noted that the Authority had duties to engage in collective bargaining and to enter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33386 - 2008-07-10
officials. We noted that the Authority had duties to engage in collective bargaining and to enter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33386 - 2008-07-10
WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1903-CR Complete Titl...
-Schmidt, but contending he did not act with an intent to kill. The jury found Schmidt guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86699 - 2012-10-30
-Schmidt, but contending he did not act with an intent to kill. The jury found Schmidt guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86699 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Jermel A. Robertson appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452863 - 2021-11-16
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Jermel A. Robertson appeals a judgment of conviction entered after a jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452863 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered following a jury trial for first-degree reckless homicide, hiding a corpse, and strangulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721955 - 2023-10-31
entered following a jury trial for first-degree reckless homicide, hiding a corpse, and strangulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721955 - 2023-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and costs on its § 100.18 claim, on which the County had prevailed in a jury trial. ¶3 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13
and costs on its § 100.18 claim, on which the County had prevailed in a jury trial. ¶3 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68025 - 2011-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and costs on its § 100.18 claim, on which the County had prevailed in a jury trial. ¶3 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68025 - 2014-09-15
and costs on its § 100.18 claim, on which the County had prevailed in a jury trial. ¶3 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68025 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 113
not act with an intent to kill. The jury found Schmidt guilty. In a postconviction motion, Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86699 - 2014-09-15
not act with an intent to kill. The jury found Schmidt guilty. In a postconviction motion, Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86699 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to a jury trial, and the case was tried to a jury over a three-day period. The jury determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044999 - 2025-12-03
to a jury trial, and the case was tried to a jury over a three-day period. The jury determined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044999 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to a jury trial, and the case was tried to a jury over a three-day period. The jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044999 - 2025-12-03
to a jury trial, and the case was tried to a jury over a three-day period. The jury determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044999 - 2025-12-03