Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22151 - 22160 of 29713 for des.
Search results 22151 - 22160 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Thomas F.
of law which we review de novo.4 Courtney E. began with a petition alleging that the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8717 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo.4 Courtney E. began with a petition alleging that the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8717 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. No. 2023AP1259 8 ¶19 One central dispute in this case is whether any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832654 - 2024-07-31
review de novo. Id. No. 2023AP1259 8 ¶19 One central dispute in this case is whether any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832654 - 2024-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings to the legal standard is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
factual findings to the legal standard is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29936 - 2007-08-08
summary judgment analysis de novo, applying the same method employed by circuit courts. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29936 - 2007-08-08
State v. Donald Williams
. Statutory construction involves a question of law and therefore our review is de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10833 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory construction involves a question of law and therefore our review is de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10833 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61134 - 2011-03-14
2007 WI APP 190
We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29712 - 2007-08-27
We review a trial court’s conclusions of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29712 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de novo. See id. ¶17 Courts may decide ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133694 - 2017-09-21
State v. Pablo R.
. The interpretation or application of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2386 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation or application of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶11 The Fourth Amendment of the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261540 - 2020-05-20
to those facts is a question of law we review de novo. Id. ¶11 The Fourth Amendment of the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261540 - 2020-05-20