Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22151 - 22160 of 58328 for speedy trial.
Search results 22151 - 22160 of 58328 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
LBY and Associates, Inc. v. Warren Lee Brandt
on August 19, 1999 …." His brief, however, addresses the trial court's denial on August 19 of Brandt's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
on August 19, 1999 …." His brief, however, addresses the trial court's denial on August 19 of Brandt's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On appeal, Harper contends that the State failed to present sufficient evidence during his jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718306 - 2023-10-24
. On appeal, Harper contends that the State failed to present sufficient evidence during his jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718306 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
State v. Willie M. Kendricks
that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford pleas; and (2) his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5177 - 2017-09-19
that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford pleas; and (2) his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5177 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. Id. at 214 (directing that, if the State fails to prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
trial. Id. at 214 (directing that, if the State fails to prove by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
proceeding was “fundamentally unfair,” and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12195 - 2005-03-31
proceeding was “fundamentally unfair,” and that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12195 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] Groves argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain his convictions, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38806 - 2009-08-03
] Groves argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain his convictions, the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38806 - 2009-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances; the State prevented her from testifying; and she was never identified at trial. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64150 - 2014-09-15
circumstances; the State prevented her from testifying; and she was never identified at trial. ¶2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64150 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testifying; and she was never identified at trial. ¶2 We conclude the officer lawfully entered Nowak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64150 - 2011-05-16
testifying; and she was never identified at trial. ¶2 We conclude the officer lawfully entered Nowak’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64150 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Scott D. Steffes
Steffes appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14681 - 2017-09-21
Steffes appeals from a judgment, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14681 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
an answer and counterclaim. The matter was set for a trial before the court commissioner on December 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53590 - 2014-09-15
an answer and counterclaim. The matter was set for a trial before the court commissioner on December 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53590 - 2014-09-15