Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 31391 for SUBPEONA FORM.

Megal Development Corporation v. Craig Shadof
judgment as a dischargeable debt on Schedule D of their bankruptcy forms. In due course, the bankruptcy
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1239 - 2004-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
require the [trial] court “to form its independent judgment after a review of the record and pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27185 - 2006-11-20

COURT OF APPEALS
inattentive driving, the impression Kenney and his backup officer formed that Bilquist spoke as though she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122323 - 2014-09-22

COURT OF APPEALS
to an exchange that forms the basis for this appeal. Prior to trial, Foley stipulated to the element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28

COURT OF APPEALS
has newly discovered evidence, in the form of an affidavit[2] from Wallace, to confirm that Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121636 - 2014-09-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in 1999 at the request of his step-son, Stephen Bouton. Rubenzer and Bouton formed BRW Development
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80697 - 2014-09-15

James R. Grassman v. Deanna L. Grassman
disclosure forms, the court determined that James had inflated his expenses and, therefore, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16143 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
was ineffective because counsel refused to produce evidence in the form of a petition signed by the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4083 - 2007-11-13

State v. Jared J.
….” Section 48.365(2g)(a). Because restitution is one form of rehabilitation and the Children’s Code clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and experience may form the basis for expert testimony.” Hogan, 397 Wis. 2d 171, ¶25; see also State v. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23