Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Towne Realty, Inc. v. Zurich Insurance Company
duty to defend is a question of law, we review both questions de novo without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16920 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Yehuda Elmakias v. Michael Wayda
of law that we review de novo. See Stern, 185 Wis.2d at 236, 517 N.W.2d at 664. Because the inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14769 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34251 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the MSA, we review that issue de novo. See Winters v. Winters, 2005 WI App 94, ¶15, 281 Wis. 2d 798
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05

COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law reviewed de novo. Dubose, 285 Wis. 2d 143, ¶16. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15

COURT OF APPEALS
are not convinced. ¶23 Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06

World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Robert J. Mikulsky
of this appeal requires interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 134.90(4), a question of law we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2752 - 2005-03-31

Town of Port Washington v. City of Port Washington
court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis. 2d 675, 682, 550 N.W.2d 134
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lisa K. Alberte v. Anew Health Care Services, Inc.
of law subject to our de novo review. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405–406, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6945 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] The Estate of Robert Murray v. The Travelers Insurance Company
judgment is subject to de novo review by the appellate court. See Sauk County v. Employers Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13653 - 2017-09-21