Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 29823 for des.
William C. Frazier v. Jeffrey W. Senglaub
. Senglaub appeals. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¶11 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18
. Senglaub appeals. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ¶11 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19977 - 2005-10-18
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19
of statutes and their application to the facts— which we decide de novo. State v. Schoepp, 204 Wis.2d 266
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11601 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Donald A. Hills
operations." Our review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9532 - 2017-09-19
operations." Our review of summary judgment is de novo. Park Bancorporation, Inc. v. Sletteland, 182 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9532 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15
performed deficiently and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98322 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we determine de novo on a case- by-case basis. See id., ¶¶25, 33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98147 - 2014-09-15
a question of law that we determine de novo on a case- by-case basis. See id., ¶¶25, 33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Arthur H. Hurckman v. Secura Insurance Company
a summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9898 - 2017-09-19
a summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9898 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Anthony v. Lawrence R. LaPorte
or the terms of the insurance contract presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10915 - 2017-09-20
or the terms of the insurance contract presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10915 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217938 - 2018-08-21
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217938 - 2018-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ‘we grant deference only to the [trial] court’s findings of historical fact. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
, ‘we grant deference only to the [trial] court’s findings of historical fact. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence is,” and if the court omitted it, it would be “de-emphasizing part of the State’s case.” ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11
the evidence is,” and if the court omitted it, it would be “de-emphasizing part of the State’s case.” ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11