Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 64027 for records/1000.
Brown County v. April O.
was seventy-two days. An examination of the record fails to reveal any reason for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3419 - 2005-03-31
was seventy-two days. An examination of the record fails to reveal any reason for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Devery Shanowat
that the record does not reflect whether the DNA was found on the first or second pair of underpants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5404 - 2017-09-19
that the record does not reflect whether the DNA was found on the first or second pair of underpants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5404 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brigitte A. Buchmeier v. Lloyd Buchmeier, Jr.
because they are supported by the record. Although Lloyd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19387 - 2017-09-21
because they are supported by the record. Although Lloyd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19387 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6896 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6896 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
petition for waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21
petition for waiver of juvenile court jurisdiction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635289 - 2023-03-21
[PDF]
George H. Frank, Jr. v. Doris M. Frank
-FT 2 whether certain findings were supported by the record. We conclude they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6461 - 2017-09-19
-FT 2 whether certain findings were supported by the record. We conclude they were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6461 - 2017-09-19
Robert D. Zitowsky v. Dane County
decision solely on the submitted time sheets and reference to other cases, without regard to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13651 - 2005-03-31
decision solely on the submitted time sheets and reference to other cases, without regard to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert D. Zitowsky v. Dane County
regard to the record or Zitowsky’s explanations. The trial court did not explain why time spent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13651 - 2017-09-21
regard to the record or Zitowsky’s explanations. The trial court did not explain why time spent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13651 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
is not an available defense to the requirements of the implied consent law. Further, the record does not sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13041 - 2017-09-21
is not an available defense to the requirements of the implied consent law. Further, the record does not sustain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13041 - 2017-09-21
Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
in the record or reasonable inferences therefrom and the correct application of the proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9672 - 2005-03-31
in the record or reasonable inferences therefrom and the correct application of the proper legal standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9672 - 2005-03-31