Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 22161 - 22170 of 63981 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16
a response, but has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143331 - 2015-06-16
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the orders may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107601 - 2014-02-04
review of the record, we conclude that the orders may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107601 - 2014-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226505 - 2018-11-07
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226505 - 2018-11-07
State v. Kevin R. Booth
in the outcome. Id. ¶12 After reviewing the record, we conclude that a Machner hearing was not necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3383 - 2005-03-31
in the outcome. Id. ¶12 After reviewing the record, we conclude that a Machner hearing was not necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712972 - 2023-10-11
not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=712972 - 2023-10-11
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6897 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ivan L. Higginbotham, Jr.
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
and voluntary. Because the record shows Higginbotham did not clearly and unequivocally express that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6895 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
; and (2) the court of appeals neglected its obligation to independently review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
; and (2) the court of appeals neglected its obligation to independently review the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252399 - 2020-01-10
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252399 - 2020-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from E.R.T. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173828 - 2017-09-21
from E.R.T. Based upon an independent review of the no-merit report and circuit court record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173828 - 2017-09-21