Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22171 - 22180 of 69380 for as he.
Search results 22171 - 22180 of 69380 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
weapon. For the former offense, he faced maximum penalties of twelve and one-half years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235234 - 2019-02-15
weapon. For the former offense, he faced maximum penalties of twelve and one-half years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235234 - 2019-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Constantine F. Weimer
). No. 2005AP771-CR 2 argues that a defendant cannot be convicted for violating § 944.30(1) if all he says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19094 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2005AP771-CR 2 argues that a defendant cannot be convicted for violating § 944.30(1) if all he says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19094 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
in the burglary and theft cases. He did appeal his forgery convictions, and we affirmed by summary order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19
in the burglary and theft cases. He did appeal his forgery convictions, and we affirmed by summary order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). No. 2021AP370-CRNM 4 Vinson’s response primarily argues that he was improperly convicted of the lesser
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446063 - 2021-10-27
). No. 2021AP370-CRNM 4 Vinson’s response primarily argues that he was improperly convicted of the lesser
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446063 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his conviction for intentional mistreatment of animals. He argues that he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
his conviction for intentional mistreatment of animals. He argues that he was denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated. The following is relevant testimony from the trial. ¶3 The arresting officer testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
intoxicated. The following is relevant testimony from the trial. ¶3 The arresting officer testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234159 - 2019-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
cause after he suffered a workplace injury, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 102.35(3).[1] Superior argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61578 - 2011-03-21
cause after he suffered a workplace injury, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 102.35(3).[1] Superior argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61578 - 2011-03-21
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
-2138). Lagundoye signed a guilty-plea questionnaire and waiver-of-rights form acknowledging that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5544 - 2005-03-31
-2138). Lagundoye signed a guilty-plea questionnaire and waiver-of-rights form acknowledging that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5544 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Carter argues the admission of what he claims was inadmissible hearsay deprived him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52097 - 2010-07-14
for postconviction relief. Carter argues the admission of what he claims was inadmissible hearsay deprived him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52097 - 2010-07-14
State v. Daniel L. Terens
in the linoleum. Christine testified that he also grabbed her nipple and threatened to cut it off, desisting only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19149 - 2005-08-02
in the linoleum. Christine testified that he also grabbed her nipple and threatened to cut it off, desisting only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19149 - 2005-08-02