Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22181 - 22190 of 65218 for or b.
Search results 22181 - 22190 of 65218 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. (b) A person who expressly warrants or guarantees the improvement to real property, for the period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147217 - 2017-09-21
. (b) A person who expressly warrants or guarantees the improvement to real property, for the period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147217 - 2017-09-21
State v. Todd E. Crider
the result of a probation.” Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(a),(b). It would be incongruous, the State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
the result of a probation.” Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(a),(b). It would be incongruous, the State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
to a new trial with a twelve-person jury because he failed to raise the issue during his first trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, to intentionally causing bodily harm to a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b), in Milwaukee County Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73673 - 2012-01-22
, to intentionally causing bodily harm to a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.03(2)(b), in Milwaukee County Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73673 - 2012-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Stacy D. Davis
with an offer of proof. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b). Accordingly, we do not address this issue directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3403 - 2017-09-19
with an offer of proof. See WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b). Accordingly, we do not address this issue directly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3403 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that in her opinion, Vogt could not have left in his vehicle “[b]ecause there was nowhere for [him] to go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2014-10-16
that in her opinion, Vogt could not have left in his vehicle “[b]ecause there was nowhere for [him] to go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2014-10-16
State v. Sean W. Ottman
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Wisconsin Stat. § 973.155 (1997-98) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Wisconsin Stat. § 973.155 (1997-98) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15975 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats., second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant contrary to § 346.63(1)(b), Stats., second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9827 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joachim E. Dressler
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we affirm the judgment. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(2)(b). We briefly mention this point because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43221 - 2014-09-15
that we affirm the judgment. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(2)(b). We briefly mention this point because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43221 - 2014-09-15