Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 45121 for Cost-effective.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 45121 for Cost-effective.
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial, awarding the respondent, Legacy DC, Inc., damages, costs, and fees of $547,865.45. In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52418 - 2010-07-27
a jury trial, awarding the respondent, Legacy DC, Inc., damages, costs, and fees of $547,865.45. In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52418 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
Frontsheet
pay the full costs of this proceeding, which are $6,634.96 as of December 23, 2014. ¶2 No appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138116 - 2017-09-21
pay the full costs of this proceeding, which are $6,634.96 as of December 23, 2014. ¶2 No appeal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138116 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
, and the payment of the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). ¶3 Attorney Guenther has appealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19061 - 2005-07-18
, and the payment of the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). ¶3 Attorney Guenther has appealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19061 - 2005-07-18
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
, and the payment of the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). ¶3 Attorney Guenther has appealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19060 - 2005-07-18
, and the payment of the costs of the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). ¶3 Attorney Guenther has appealed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19060 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
, costs, and fees of $547,865.45. In its special verdict, the jury found that the Actkins breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52418 - 2014-09-15
, costs, and fees of $547,865.45. In its special verdict, the jury found that the Actkins breached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52418 - 2014-09-15
Rule Order
, the court voted the effective date of the amendments adopted herein will be July 1, 2009, and that the court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35116 - 2009-01-05
, the court voted the effective date of the amendments adopted herein will be July 1, 2009, and that the court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35116 - 2009-01-05
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
to intervention effectively attempts to modify the judgment by seeking reversal of the trial court's interlocutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8957 - 2005-03-31
to intervention effectively attempts to modify the judgment by seeking reversal of the trial court's interlocutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“effective upon the disability or incapacity of Kreitlow.” Two months later, Kreitlow signed a basic power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241970 - 2019-06-12
“effective upon the disability or incapacity of Kreitlow.” Two months later, Kreitlow signed a basic power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241970 - 2019-06-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
was in effect on the date that the orders from which these appeals are taken were entered as well as when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32502 - 2014-09-15
was in effect on the date that the orders from which these appeals are taken were entered as well as when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32502 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
to intervention effectively attempts to modify the judgment by seeking reversal of the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19
to intervention effectively attempts to modify the judgment by seeking reversal of the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19