Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2221 - 2230 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence of a court” satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10906 - 2017-09-20
to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence of a court” satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10906 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
matter jurisdiction to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
matter jurisdiction to review the motions. Under § 974.06(1), only a “prisoner in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Throndson understood the maximum penalties for each offense and that the court was not bound by the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15
that Throndson understood the maximum penalties for each offense and that the court was not bound by the joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391355 - 2021-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motions for sentencing credit in two separate cases. Armstrong filed separate appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
denying his motions for sentencing credit in two separate cases. Armstrong filed separate appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his motions for sentencing credit in two separate cases. Armstrong filed separate appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
denying his motions for sentencing credit in two separate cases. Armstrong filed separate appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1074454 - 2026-02-10
State v. Kevin S. Schatzke
a judgment of conviction and an order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Schatzke argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4811 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction and an order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Schatzke argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4811 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin S. Schatzke
of conviction and an order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Schatzke argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4811 - 2017-09-20
of conviction and an order denying a postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Schatzke argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4811 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
, and a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141509 - 2015-05-06
, and a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141509 - 2015-05-06
Rhonda Brown v. Curtis-Universal Inc.
. On July 16, 1997, the City filed a motion to dismiss Curtis’s third-party contribution complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13151 - 2005-03-31
. On July 16, 1997, the City filed a motion to dismiss Curtis’s third-party contribution complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13151 - 2005-03-31
Ralph A. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County
believed necessary," Tjader filed a motion pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.02(3) for the issuance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16672 - 2005-03-31
believed necessary," Tjader filed a motion pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 968.02(3) for the issuance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16672 - 2005-03-31